Puvio
· Written by the Puvio team · Deepam, founder · Corrections · Start free
Huntr versus Puvio
| Job | Huntr | Puvio | You still do |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kanban of applications | Core product | One card per role, stages | Apply through the employer portal |
| Chrome save / autofill | Yes | No autofill. No auto-apply | File the packet when required |
| Who to ask | You keep that list | Alumni and team, ranked | Pick the name |
| Researched note | Not the center | Draft from your record | Copy and send |
| After you land | Search CRM | Win log and brag export | Log the work |
You need a polished CRM for a high-volume search. Drag-and-drop stages, Chrome save, autofill, document storage. Huntr is built for organizing applications at scale.
Tracking 400 silent applications is not the bottleneck. Getting a researched note to an alum or someone on the team is. Each card embeds fit, company intel, ranked contacts, and a draft. You send it yourself. No autofill. No auto-send.
Daniel Cho closed weak-fit cards instead of adding an eighteenth Easy Apply, then sent five notes. Two replies in nine days. Story: puvio.app/stories/after-the-layoff
Some keep Huntr for pipeline hygiene and run targeted outreach in Puvio for roles that matter. Different jobs: organize versus prepare the human path. If you can only pay for one, pick the bottleneck. Volume filing: Huntr. Silence after filing: Puvio.
Huntr autofill speeds forms. That is useful when a company requires a packet. It is also how people end up with 400 silent rows and a LinkedIn account they are scared to touch. Puvio does not autofill, does not mass-apply, and never asks for LinkedIn credentials.
Huntr is commonly $30 to $40/month for the CRM. Puvio Job search is $15/month for fit, contacts, and drafts. Complete is $29/month if you want the win log in the same product. You still submit through the employer portal when required. puvio.app/pricing