Puvio
Comparison
Teal ($29/mo or $9/week) focuses on resume tailoring, ATS keyword matching, and job tracking with a Chrome extension. Puvio ($0–$29/mo) focuses on what happens after the resume: fit score, company research, hiring manager contacts, and outreach drafts in Hunter — plus Grower to log wins. Teal optimizes your resume for the parser; Puvio prepares the note you send to a human.
Bottom line: Use Teal if resume keyword matching is your main bottleneck; choose Puvio if you want to reach the hiring manager with researched outreach and log wins for review season.
Updated 2026-07-08
| Dimension | Teal | Puvio |
|---|---|---|
| Core focus | Resume keyword tailoring + ATS match scoring | Hiring manager outreach + win log and brag doc |
| Hiring manager outreach | No — stops at resume generation | Core Hunter workflow: contacts, research, drafts |
| ATS keyword matching | Yes — primary feature with match percentage | No — Puvio bypasses ATS via direct outreach |
| Company research | Job description parsing only | News, strategy, team, funding per role |
| Fit scoring | Resume-to-JD keyword match % | Skills, experience, and career trajectory vs role requirements |
| Application tracking | Chrome extension + Kanban board | Kanban board with research, contacts, and outreach per card |
| Career growth / brag doc | No post-hire features | Grower: weekly wins, impact metrics, brag doc export |
| LinkedIn login required | Chrome extension uses LinkedIn data | Never required — paste any job URL |
| Free tier | Limited: 10 templates, 10 AI bullets | 75 credits, no card required, full feature access |
| Pricing | $9/week or $29/mo | $0 start · Hunter $15/mo · Complete $29/mo |
You want to maximize ATS keyword match scores on your resume and save jobs directly from browser tabs. Teal is the strongest resume-tailoring tool in the market.
You believe the interview comes from the human, not the parser — and you want fit scores, company research, hiring manager contacts, outreach drafts, plus a win log after you get hired.